Friday, November 03, 2006


HIROSHIMA, Japan (AFP) - Archbishop Desmond Tutu has urged for a cancellation of developing countries' debts, likening their suffering to the devastation of the nuclear bombings in Japan.


Tutu made his appeal in Hiroshima, where he and fellow Nobel laureates the Dalai Lama and Betty Williams issued a joint appeal for the abolition of nuclear weapons, which obliterated this city and Nagasaki in 1945.

Tutu, a leading moral force against South African apartheid, said that debt relief was a concrete way for Japan to demonstrate its oft-stated post-war commitment to peace.

"Many, many countries, in the way you were here devastated by the atom bomb, are devastated by poverty, by disease, by an international economic system that is fundamentally unjust," Tutu said.

"I hope that your experience of the injustice of atom bombs falling on you would give you the passion, which you already have, of wanting to help others rise from the ashes," he said.

"So Japan ought to be in the forefront in cancelling all international debts that so many countries bear a heavy burden" from, Tutu said.

The Group of Eight major industrialized nations last year agreed to help alleviate poor countries' debt burden, which critics say means more money goes to paying interest than to schools or health care.

Japan, however, has been hesitant about calls for blanket debt relief, arguing that such a move would encourage imprudent borrowing.

Tutu issued a joint statement with the Dalai Lama and Williams, who won the prize for promoting peace in Northern Ireland, calling for the abolition of nuclear weapons and hailing Hiroshima's "spirit of forgiveness."

"Destruction of your neighbor and even your enemy is destruction of yourself," read the statement of the "Hiroshima International Peace Summit" organized by Japanese activists.

Tutu, who led a reconciliation commission after the end of apartheid, warned against a cycle of retribution.

"The reprisal against the suicide bomber does not bring peace. There is a suicide bomber, a reprisal and then a counter-reprisal. And it just goes on and on," Tutu said.

And he cautioned against linking Islam to terrorism.

"There are terrorists in Ireland. But are they called Christian terrorists? No, they are called the IRA," he said, referring to the
Irish Republican Army in British-ruled Northern Ireland.

"The people who bombed Oklahoma City, they were Christians. But we didn't say Christianity produces these creatures," he said. "There are good Christians and bad Christians and there are good Muslims and bad Muslims."

The Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, also appealed for understanding among religions.

"The problem is the concept of 'one religion,'" said the Buddhist monk.

"Today the world is heavily interconnected, like India where for at least 2,000 years different traditions have lived together," he said. "There is no longer one truth, or only one religion that is relevant."

"My faith is in the Buddha but I equally have deep respect, admiration and appreciation of other traditions because these traditions serve humanity," he said.

To see what Archbishop Desmond Tutu is about please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desmond_Tutu

While there are some issues I do not agree on with him he does make some very valid points, also the article comes from http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061102/wl_asia_afp/japansafricaeconomyrelief_061102155448


Also, on a personal note while Tutu likens the debt burden to nuclear war, I would consider it an issue of social economic injustice, not war persay. Grace and Peace

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Thoughts on Contemplation/Happiness by Thomas Merton

We live in age in which "true happiness" is perceived in the things we have accumulated over time like T.V.'s, cars, the clothes we wear, who we date or marry or who we have studied under in our educational upbringing or the most obvious is how much money you have or make. While all of this is important to a certain extant. The question must be asked is who puts this extra pressure on us? Is it the media, parents or other external things we come in contact with throughout our life time? If we are completely honest with ourselves we could put the blame on any of the above reasons. In 1966 Thomas Merton wrote in Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander that I believe really speaks to the heart of the issue by saying:
“Why can we not be content with the secret gift of the happiness that God offers us, without consulting the rest of the world? Why do we insist, rather, on a happiness that is approved by the magazines and TV? Perhaps because we do not believe in a happiness that is given to us for nothing. We do not think we can be happy with a happiness that has no price tag on it.”(pg.84)
I think Merton could have really been talking about our generation that is so caught up in trying to be happy by buying the newest gadget that is available in the market. How come most Christians get this very simple concept, have we got so caught up in the "prosperity gospel" message? Do many of us not realize we have bought the lie of artificial happiness? Just some thoughts!!! Peace and Grace...

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Passion of the Christ

The following is a critique of the film by Mel Gibson "Passion of the Christ" it was for a New Testament class. Hope you enjoy!!!


Mel Gibson’s film “The Passion of the Christ” is one of the most influential films of all time. As far as its box office success it is the top rated religious film of all time. But while it is great that a religious film has had such a great impact on society the question remains is it historical accurate to the gospels? The answer is mixed.
Gibson basic text comes from a book entitled The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ by Anne Catherine Emmerich. She was an Augustinian nun who by the age of twenty- four claimed to have visions of the crucified Christ. Whether she really did or not, I have no clue. But it does make for an interesting read. The gospels for Gibson seem to be used for a secondary source instead of a first source. It is also important to remember that Gibson comes from the Catholic Church tradition.
It seems that to every story of the gospel that he used he seemed to add a little something to it. For example, you see Satan as a female and at certain time lurking in the background. Second, in the movie Judas is seen trying to return the monies and moments later seen being chased by little boys down a hill calling him “possessed” until he commits suicide. Third, the emphasis of Mary is extremely misleading. There is a part in the movie in the beginning when Jesus is taken to prison were Mary gets down on the ground and it appears that Jesus is right below her its seems as though she can hear Him underneath. My point is that we know nothing about Satan during this time from the biblical record, except I am sure he was present in the hearts of men during the horrible time. Judas all we know is that he did commit suicide. Mary on the other hand from the biblical record is not mentioned until Jesus nearly dies and Jesus gives her to John for him to take care of her and vise versa.
My point for all of this is to say while Gibson’s “Passion of the Christ” is extremely important for the Christian community as far a presenting all peoples to some truth of the gospels account of the Passion it is not historical accurate as it is so portrayed. This being said I think the movie should be continued to be used by the Christian church for evangelism purposes but with the audience knowing that this movie portrays how Mel Gibson sees the crucifixion of Christ. I think Gibson’s heart and intent was in the right place. He wanted to make the crucifixion come alive, become real for people to see that this event was not easy or a game, it cost somebody his life. And for that I give Gibson a A+.

Monday, September 18, 2006

Women in Church part 1

This blog deals with my attempt to show that women do have a place of authority and leadership in the Church. Below is the beginnings of a paper for Biblical Hermeneutics at Ashland Theological Seminary.

Anne Dutton (1692-1765) a Baptist writer who had a profound impact with the people of her time. She had correspondences with John Wesley and George Whitefield.






The Survey

My first general observation of 1 Timothy 2:1-15 (NRSV) seems to deal with prayer (1-3), menÂ’s attitude in worship service (8), womenÂ’s correct attire and place in worship (9-12) the reason for such rules or regulations (13-14), finally the reward (15). It seems to me that the Apostle PaulÂ’s concern is purely trying to bring order to a specific church that is very much in disorder concerning the order of worship and dealing with false doctrine or teaching. Also given that the majority of verses are directed toward women are they to blame for the trouble of this particular church? Are verses 9-12 to be taken literal for all time? Or does it just deal with that church at that time? And if it is to be taken as literal what does this do for the other Scriptures in which women seem to used by God or Jesus either directly or indirectly for their purpose? If the Bible is to be a book of liberation for the sinner, why has the church used these verses to suppress women? I hope to be able to come to some general consensus through my study not only of this chapter and verses but the Scriptures as a whole and the history of catholic (universal) church.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Thoughts on Thomas Merton


"The purpose of a book of meditations is to teach you how to think and not to do your thinking for you. Consequently if you pick up such a book and simply read it through, you are wasting your time. As soon as any thought stimulates your mind or your heart you canput the book down because your meditiation has begun. To think that you are somehow obliged to follow the author of the book to his own particular conclusion would be a great mistake. It may happen that his conclusion does not apply to you. God may want you to end up somewhere else. He may have planned to give you quite a different grace than the one the author suggest you might be needing." (New Seeds of Contemplation 215)

Thomas Merton is considered one of the greatest spiritual writers of our time. His views on the spiritual life, peace, war and religion in general have stood the test of time. His writings are considered in the league of Dr. Martin Luther King, Henri Nouwen. The Merton Prayer has also helped people in their time of need including myself it goes like this:

MY LORD GOD, I have no idea where I am going. I do not see the road ahead of me. I cannot know for certain where it will end. Nor do I really know myself, and the fact that I think I am following your will does not mean that I am actually doing so. But I believe that the desire to please you does in fact please you. And I hope I have that desire in all that I am doing. I hope that I will never do anything apart from that desire. And I know that if I do this you will lead me by the right road though I may know nothing about it. Therefore I will trust you always though I may seem to be lost and in the shadow of death. I will not fear, for you are ever with me, and you will never leave me to face my perils alone.- Thomas Merton, "Thoughts in Solitude"


Well a couple of weeks ago I picked up a new book that is by Thomas Merton big suprise there...heheh. Anyway it is called "Peace in the Post-Christian Era." It was original written in the 1960's but he was not allowed under orders from his Abbot to published it but he secretly sent it to friends, including the sister-in law of JFK and it also suggest that through the underground movement a copy was given to the Pope at that time because around the same time the Pope released his writings(encyclical) on the Church position of the war, and it had ring of Merton. He also published some of the chapters as seprate articles to different magazines of the day mostly the Catholic Quarterly, leave it to him buck the system. While it was written in response to the Cold War I believe it would serve the Church greatly to read it about what the Christians response to war should be.

Monday, June 12, 2006

Nouwen

Henri Nouwen one of the greatest intellects and writers of our time. He was a ordained priest in the Catholic Church. He did teaching at Yale, Harvard and Notre Dame. But his greatest success came as be pastor for a mentally handicapped community called L'Arche. Nouwen teaches us the God truly is "the wounded healer"in his book called The Wounded Healer Nouwen tells a story from the Talmud that goes like this:
Rabbi Yoshua ben Levi came upon Elijah the prophet while he was standing at the entrance of the Rabbi ben Yohai's cave...He asked Elijah, "When will the Messiah come?" Elijah replied, "Go and ask him yourself." "Where is he?" "Sitting at the gates of the city," "How shall I know him?" "He is sitting among the poor covered with wounds. The others unbind all their wounds at the same time and then bind them up again. But he unbinds one at a time and binds it up again, saying to himself, 'Perhaps I shall be needed: if so I must always be ready so as not to delay for a moment.'" (82-3, The Wounded Healer)
The point is that Christ is "The Wounded Healer" He knows our pains and our hurts, but He is there in the mist of it working His purpose. His purpose is to draw us to Himself. A.W. Tozer a preacher wrote once "That whom God would use greatly, He first wounds deeply." I truly believe that Nouwen knew that in his personal life. He was a man of great faith but was also troubled with depression at different points of his life.
Will he be regarded in the same likes as C.S. Lewis or St. Augustine in say twenty or thirty years from now? If the current trend contuines I believe he will. Even though he was Catholic. Nouwen does not just speak just for Catholics. He crosses the bridge to offer a himself to all who yearn to know God more personal and real. He was a man who got tired of the academic life and offered himself to those who the world viewed as worthless and nothing to offer and in the end found true happiness and joy and God has used him to touch countless lives and many have come to see the Light of Christ.
He died suddenly on September 21, 1996 at the L'Arche community.